NEPAL SOCIETY
NEPAL IS OFTEN CHARACTERIZED
as a country caught in two different worlds, having
one leg in the sixteenth century and another in the
twentieth century. Entrenched in a feudalistic social
structure, the deeply tradition-bound society increasingly
was experiencing the pervasive influence of Western
material culture. Most affected were the parts of
the population that came in regular contact with Westerners.
Nowhere was this juxtaposition of local traditional
values and Western material culture more pronounced
than in the Kathmandu Valley--the country's most urbanized
region. In the Kathmandu Valley in 1991, hordes of
people took ritual baths in the highly polluted Baghmati
River, especially near the temple of Pashupatinath,
and walked to temples that dotted the valley's landscape.
Numerous peasants carried their produce to the market
on bicycles or on what is locally called a kharpan,
a device that resembles a large weighing balance and
is carried on the shoulder. Yet, young boys wore T-shirts
emblazoned with Michael Jackson or other Hollywood
celebrities and watched "Miami Vice" or
other American television shows. The skyline of urban
areas such as Kathmandu, Siddhartha Nagar, and Pokhara
was interrupted by television antennas. Copying Western
popular culture and values had become the thing to
do. Nepalese youth even took drugs, and the number
of drug addicts had increased significantly in the
1980s. The adoption of Western popular cultural values
has not, however, translated into much-needed technological
and economic progress and a consequent reduction in
pervasive poverty. Although youths, especially those
living in and around urban centers, readily adopted
Western consumer habits, they appeared to have little
knowledge about more productive habits that the West
exemplifies. Entranced by the tide of consumerism,
Nepalese youths seemed poorly prepared or unwilling
to do hard work and make sacrifices that were imperative
for establishing dynamic economic production and development.
As a result, consumerism outpaced productive capacity--a
process that was clearly contrary to sustained socioeconomic
progress--and the country remained in a state of economic
backwardness.
Despite Nepal's increasing
contact with the West since liberation from Rana rule
in 1951, the feudalistic yoke has not been broken.
Even after thirty-five years of economic development
planning, poverty remained throughout the country.
Government intervention in economic development under
the rubric of planning has led to a breakdown in the
traditional patron-client relations. In the past,
this relationship provided some security of survival--or
what Karl Polyani termed in 1957 "the absence
of the threat of individual starvation"--for
the clients, although they were placed in a subservient
position. In 1991 such patron-client relations had
been replaced by wage relations, but planned development
had not been able to create enough employment opportunities
to gainfully absorb the clients who no longer could
rely on their patrons. There was no doubt among observers
that only an increasing flow of foreign aid and loans
had kept Nepal from bankruptcy. Yet there seemed to
be little evidence suggesting that the aid had, despite
good intentions, alleviated mass poverty and uplifted
the society as a whole. Unemployment among the educated
was partially addressed through the continued expansion
of government jobs, but such expansion resulted in
bureaucratic redundancy and, in fact, hindered economic
development. Furthermore, such a strategy had only
a limited ability to reduce the mass unemployment
and underemployment that typified Nepal's society.
Widespread unemployment and underemployment, which
fueled poverty, further were exacerbated by continued
rapid population growth. Despite a long-term and vigorous
family planning program, the population had been growing
at an increasing rate. Such population growth contributed
to increasing environmental deterioration, given the
frailty of the country's mountainous environment.